Category Archives: Moderately Uncategorized Gabbing

Stuff that doesn’t fit in any other category

Humor – Catch 22

Let’s look at a novel you probably read in high school…


Catch 22 is an antiwar novel published in 1961. Though it takes place in WW2, the novel is a satire of postwar America, which was at the time waging a bloody and stupid war in Korea.

Let’s look at chapter 1. We meet the protagonist, Yossarian, in the hospital, where he is heroically pretending to be sick to avoid doing his job.

  1. The novel has a reality that veers from horrifying to cartoonishly silly. Why do we accept it? How does he introduce this world, and its strange rules?
  2. Yossarian is a coward, in a war we culturally think of as heroic. Do we like him, regardless? Why?
  3. Do you use humor or satire in your work? How, and why? To lighten the mood, to make us like a certain character, to connect to the reader, etc.? How is Heller using it, here?
  4. This is a novel obsessed with paradoxes, in its characters, dialogue, plot, and even structure. Which ones stand out to you? What purpose do these paradoxes serve?

Leave a comment

Filed under Moderately Uncategorized Gabbing

“Medium Warp” by Mike Oliphant

This week, we’re reading Mike Oliphant’s “Medium Warp: Excerpt’s of a Digital Consciousness,” which was recently published in Thin Air Magazine.  Full disclosure, Oliphant is a MUG alum, and it’s fantastic seeing his work out in the world! “Medium Warp” is a very experimental hybrid poetry/fiction piece, so take time to let the story sink in:
Also, Oliphant did an interview with Thin Air Magazine, which might help give context to his flash piece:
“Carmen Maria Machado dubbed herself a ‘form vampire,’ a title which very much resonates with me. Once I have a form in mind, that’s where research comes in. If I want to write a user agreement for the universe and everything in it, then I need to research what one looks like, what language it uses and why.”


  • What’s this story about? How does Oliphant use form to enhance content?
  • Humans will always tell stories. With the evolution of fiction in our digital/internet/coding world, how do you see stories presented in the future?
  • Did this hybrid piece give you any inspiration on ways to play with form in your own writing? Or possibly ideas for crossing boundaries between genres or other forms?


Mike Oliphant received his MFA at Western Washington University, and is Consulting Editor of the Bellingham Review. A portion of his collection Medium Warp was the recipient of the 2018 Gas Station Prize. He was a 2017 Pushcart Nominee and his short fiction and poetry are either forthcoming or have appeared in Isthmus, Psaltery & Lyre, IDK Magazine, Shooter Literary Magazine, NANO Fiction, and elsewhere.


Leave a comment

Filed under Moderately Uncategorized Gabbing

“Why Your Mother Can’t Drive” by Cinelle Barnes (For Aug 8 Meeting)


“Why Your Mother Can’t Drive” is an essay written by Cinelle Barnes, a Filipino American writer. The Buzzfeed link on her website description reads: “Barnes explores why she does not drive… and explains how her past informs her present.”

Barnes is also author of Monsoon Mansion: A Memoir, which chronicles her experiences growing up in the Philippines, living in New York City as an undocumented immigrant, getting married, and completing her MFA.

1. In an interview with the Charleston City Paper, Barnes says she wants readers to feel like they’re “drowning a bit” when they read her book. Does she attempt this in her essay? Did you feel like drowning? How does she accomplish this?

2. The start of the essay is generic and can apply to any mother or any race and ethnicity. As the story progresses, she gives specifics and drops hints of her childhood trauma. Is this effective in keeping readers engaged? Starting generic and moving onto specifics?

3. What is the purpose of the refrain, “Your other can’t drive?” Does it help the rhythm and pacing of the story or does it get mundane?

4. Stories of trauma are hard to read. Was this hard to read? What made you finish it?

Leave a comment

Filed under Moderately Uncategorized Gabbing

‘Master & Commander’, Character Introductions


‘Master and Commander’ is the first of a twenty-part book series, published in 1969, by Patrick O’Brian. O’Brian, born 1914, was a successful biographer for most of his life (he wrote a definitive, if sleep-inducing, book on Picasso) before discovering his true love: writing about dudes on boats, at the age of fifty-five.

The first novel, ‘Master and Commander’, was rejected by his longtime UK publisher for being too full of jargon (a fair criticism, as you will see). It was picked up by a US publisher in 1969, where it sold middlingly, before falling out of print for fifteen years or so. He persevered, writing ten more books in the series, through that madness which possesses us, before a publisher reluctantly decided to give them another shot. When they were republished, they exploded in popularity with people who also like dudes on boats, spawning a devoted following (the books are still in most bookstores), and a surprisingly good Russel Crowe movie. O’Brian found commercial success, at age 70.

My question is why? What makes people fall in love with this series, or any series? While the world of the Napoleonic Wars is remarkably well-realized, and the action is excellent, I think most would agree that it comes down to its strong main characters.

Here is an excerpt from Chapter One (apologies, I could only find an excerpt on Amazon). Let’s read up until the scene where Jack speaks to Commandant Harte, which is the scene that ends with the line, “Was it you at the Governor’s, then?”

See the sample here:

  1. The books rely on us wanting Jack to succeed. How does O’Brian attempt to make us like, or at least empathize with Jack?
  2. Dropping the reader into this world reminds me of science-fiction novels, where the early chapters are spent attempting to understand the new rules and language of the world. How does O’Brian use the character’s point-of-view to inform us both about the character, and the world he inhabits?
  3. Similarly, what do you think of the slow pace of the opening? Does it help flesh out the world, before the action scenes, or would it’ve been better served by opening with a bang? Does the book feel old-fashioned?
  4. O’Brian’s limited third-person style is heavily informed by the character’s voice. Later, we will get scenes, and even whole books, from the point of view of Maturin. See this short excerpt from much later in the book: Great characters must have a consistent point of view and distinct voice: what techniques do you notice O’Brian doing? Are they effective?


Filed under Moderately Uncategorized Gabbing

“The Faery Handbag” by Kelly Link

Kelly Link is an American writer who has written several short story collections; among them, Get in Trouble was a 2016 Pulitzer Prize Finalist in Fiction. This week we’re reading “The Faery Handbag,” from Magic for Beginners. I’ve been on a modern fairytale kick recently, and I’ve always loved Kelly Link. This one stuck with me, and I’m looking forward to discussing it! Q’s below:

  1. What techniques does Link employ to inform our understanding of the narrator, particularly with regard to voice? What did you think of the choice to have Genevieve address the reader?
  2. Link uses clothing + accessories as an extended metaphor. What do you think she is getting at? Why?
  3. How does this story explore responsibility and failure? In what ways does the protagonist fail? In what ways succeed?
  4. What hallmarks of a classic bildungsroman does Link make use of in this story? How does she turn the typical  arc on its head? What do you make of her treatment of love?
  5. The story takes several seemingly unrelated turns (library books, Houdini, etc.). How does Link make sense of the structure and what can we learn from this?


Leave a comment

Filed under Moderately Uncategorized Gabbing

“The State of Nature” by Camille Bordas

The State of Nature - New Yorker

I stumbled upon this week’s published piece curled up in bed on Sunday morning flipping through The New Yorker. The image caught me — mountains in flames and glasses forgotten on a white counter-top. Living in Santa Barbara, we’ve recently gone through the biggest wildfire in California history. In the middle of December. It’s been said over and over that there is no longer a fire season. Every season is fire season with our changing climate and drought-stricken landscape. Mass evacuations, apocalyptic skies, smoke masks, and emergency supplies: how do we adapt to this new world?

Of course, I dove right into the story — “The State of Nature” by Camille Bordas. The story centers upon an ophthalmologist who gets burglarized and searches the flea market called the Thieves’ Market to try to regain her lost goods. Throughout the story, Bordas explores the themes of loneliness, self-reliance and survival in interesting ways. Here are some questions to ponder while reading “The State of Nature”:

  • How do material belongings play into the notion of connection and loneliness?
  • Is it better, or even possible, to survive (the impending apocalypse) in isolation?
  • How does the author play with sight in this story, and being able “see” one another (especially between “state-of-nature guy” and the narrator)?
  • How does the author subtly build up to the reveal about the mother’s secret?

Read up!

Camille Bordas has published two novels in French. Her first English-language novel, “How to Behave in a Crowd,” came out last year.

Leave a comment

Filed under Moderately Uncategorized Gabbing

“On the Street Where You Live” by Yiyun Li

Photo-Illustration by Hannah Whitaker from The New Yorker

My turn to choose a published piece arrived and I hadn’t read any short stories I especially liked lately, so I turned to my go-to–The New Yorker–wondering if I’d find something I hadn’t read yet by one of my favorite short story authors, Yiyun Li. Ta da! This week we are reading “On the Street Where You Live,” in which Li explores themes of motherhood and loneliness through a protagonist musing about her autistic son.

YiYun Li is a Chinese American author whose novels and short story collections have garnered numerous awards and been published in more than twenty languages. She is currently a contributing editor to A Public Space.

Questions to consider while reading:

  1. How does Li explore “ordinary” versus “unusual” in this story? Does Becky indeed know what “normal” is?
  2. Becky says, “You can’t share with others who your child truly is.” To what extent do you think Becky knows who Jude truly is? What techniques does Li employ to illuminate this?
  3. Consider the way Li moves from scene to scene, and the way she has framed Becky’s internal monologue with people, places, and events/actions. How does she accomplish fluidity? What effects do these things have on your overall experience of the story?
  4. Li’s commentary on race is subtle but present. How does it complement Becky’s predicament?
  5. When Becky hears William singing, she “felt furious […] at herself too, for being there, a witness to a crime, an accomplice, really.” Later in the story, she is victim to a different–“normal”–type of crime. What is Becky’s crime? How does Li use the moments to underscore the meaning of the story?
  6. Becky says, “The only option was to blunder on through hoping.” Would you consider this story to be hopeful? Why or why not?

Leave a comment

Filed under Moderately Uncategorized Gabbing

“Eyelet You Go”, by H.L. Fullerton

H.L. Fullerton is a short story writer from New York that has been published in perhaps a dozen online markets, including this one from Daily Science Fiction. Information on Fullerton is rather sparse; Twitter is about the only on-line presence I could find. I have made the assumption that Fullerton is a woman, both from this story and from her by-line; beyond that I’m afraid I can’t tell you much, except that he/she/? has only a few more publications to their name than we do.

So, on to the questions!

  1. There is a continuing trend in speculative fiction, especially in the volatile short story markets, to include modern social movements within the narrative. Sometimes these are subtle, other times not so much. How do you think Fullerton incorporates her social viewpoints into this story?
  2. The story itself dances around people asking silly questions at a party, until there’s a sudden reveal that each thing that has been discussed relates quite directly with a traumatic incident in the narrator’s past. A moment later it seems as though that incident is about to repeat itself. How did you like the plot and character development?
  3. At the end, the story turns the characters around by putting the narrator in the position of being helped by her friend Gertie, who seems to think that she’s the caretaker of the duo–quite the opposite attitude of the narrator. Did you find the ending a satisfying wrap-up to the story?

Hope you enjoyed the story!

Leave a comment

Filed under Moderately Uncategorized Gabbing

“Are We Not Men?” by T.C. Boyle

Illustration by Kristian Hammerstad from The New Yorker

A prolific American author, T.C. Boyle has published 26 books of fiction (two more since the last time we read a story of his for our published piece) and his short stories have appeared in magazines including The New Yorker, The Paris Review, and McSweeney’s. He received both his MFA and PhD from the University of Iowa, and he is a creative writing professor at USC. His work has been translated into more than two dozen foreign languages, and he’s won numerous awards.

This week we’re reading “Are We Not Men?” and here are some questions for discussion:

  1. What techniques does Boyle employ to make the world he’s created believable? To what extent do you find this story a warning?
  2. What do you make of the way Boyle uses the “cheating” trope? Would you agree or disagree that he turns it on its head?
  3. In what ways is the protagonist relatable? How do you feel about the girl, and the natural baby versus the one picked from a menu?
  4. How does Boyle explore economic status in this story?
  5. What do you make of the various creatures in the story, from the Cherry Pit to the dogcat to the micropig to the crowparrots? Discuss the animals’ relationships to each other and to the protagonist. What does each animal symbolize? What do you make of the ending?


Leave a comment

Filed under Moderately Uncategorized Gabbing

“The Book of Beginnings and Endings” by Jenny Boully


This is one of many many hybrid texts that I’ve been reading this summer. Boully’s The Book of Beginnings and Endings is hybrid in the sense of being between genres and between subjects, not completely about orexisting as any one thing. I’ve loved this about a lot of the hybrid work I’ve read lately–the way it breathes new life into the experience of reading something.


In the interest of time I’ve lifted some description of Boully and her book from the publisher’s website. Of her book, they write that it is “A book with only beginnings and endings, all invented. Jenny Boully opens and closes more than fifty topics ranging from physics and astronomy to literary theory and love. A brilliant statement on interruption, impermanence, and imperfection.”

And as for Boully herself, they write, “Boully is the author of The Body: An Essay (Slope Editions, 2002) and [one love affair]* (Tarpaulin Sky Press, 2006). Born in Thailand, she studied at Hollins University and the University of Notre Dame and is currently a PhD Candidate at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. She divides her time between Brooklyn and Texas.

Today, we’re looking at just the first 13 pages, which should be enough to give you the general effect that the book is meant to (hopefully) elicit. So, let’s begin there:

  1. What sort of feeling does this elicit from you? Not only are the entire middle contexts missing from these small samples so that all you’re left with is starts and ends, but the content is widely varying. Do you feel lost? And if so, how?
  2. When I first read this, I was constantly looking for tentpoles or anchoring around which to navigate this work. I would ask myself, Is this page a dictionary entry? An essay? The end to a novel? So, how did you keep yourself from completely getting lost.
  3. In what ways are you trying to draw connections between each page? Are you looking at the level of content and for any overlapping subjects? Or something else?
  4. Writers like Lyn Hejinian call texts like this “open,” because it’s very subject to interpretation, not close-ended the way a novel might be. What do you begin to take away from a project like this and how do you see your own role as reader?

Leave a comment

Filed under Moderately Uncategorized Gabbing